Note: You are experiencing only the raw content of this site, without the intended layout and design. Either your browser has ignored the Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) files for this site, or you are using an outdated browser which does not support Web Standards. Learn more.

Home « Blogs

EDS' Next Big Thing Blog: Read and Respond to What the EDS Fellows Say About Technology

Read and respond to what the EDS Fellows have to say about the future of technology on EDS' Next Big Thing Blog on eds.com.

Total Service Orientation – Business As Usual or Paradigm Shift?

by Rolf Kubli

Service orientation and service architecture principles have the potential to become the glue and the ordering principle across all layers of business process design and the supporting IT solutions.

On the business side, industrialization of hitherto vertically integrated enterprises calls for better structuring and decomposition of business processes, leading to shared business services and associated orchestration and integration architectures.

On the technology side, virtualization and grid computing, through higher levels of abstraction, lead to new ways of specifying functionality in business and service terms (contract, policy, quality, security…), as is already in evidence with Web services. Service science, though still in its infancy, will be growing. These trends are pointing in the same direction: service-orientation.

The gap between business and IT will be closed, leading to substantial efficiency and effectiveness improvements, as well as to risk reduction due to improved communication based on common terminology. The opportunity to arrive at seamless integration and alignment based on common service models and architecture principles is on the horizon, on one hand vertically specialized within industry sectors, on the other by sharing horizontal services - total service orientation.

Removing interoperation barriers will stimulate innovation and growth. Once the sheer computing capability is a commodity, the winners will be the companies mastering the knowledge and contact networks, which enable them to access, combine and adapt business critical services and standard service-oriented enterprise packages on a global scale faster than anybody else.

Service architecture closes the gap. People will mainly buy services of all kinds - business as usual or paradigm shift?

Published Friday, June 30, 2006 7:38 PM

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# Posted by Scott Hatanaka Monday, July 03, 2006 6:04 PM

Business as usual...

Virtualization, utility computing, grid computing have been in the mainframe world for over a decade. EDS has failed and still fails to understand the political steps required to take advantage of it. Until management starts to undertake the understanding, it won't happen, no matter what the platform. As for service science... this is the same flawed logic as before. How can we implement new features, without giving technical education? What is the difference between "service science" and "project management", and the position of "business analyst", whose results have management now finding unsatisfactory(and thus inventing 'service science'). Yes, project managers and business analysts can do some things... but tackle the big necessary projects, like getting to a utility/grid computing model, I don't see it happening.... Someone needs to have a high degree of technical and business sense to provide the vision to get there. A sense of vision that has been missing from EDS for over a decade.

# Posted by Charlie Bess Wednesday, July 05, 2006 5:40 PM

Scott, Rolfs away this week, so I'll tackle your comment. You're right virtualization is not something new. In the mainframe space EDS and others have been using it to advantage for quite a while.

When you state that EDS has not understood the political steps, I'll need a little more info than that statement to effectively provide an answer.

Virtualization shouldn't be viewed as political, after all it is just a technology that can be used to advantage. Utility computing will be a whole other matter. It can upset the status quo and that is always political. I doubt that it should be a question about "if", but "when". Still, there are many players who can stand in the way of progress in this space.

Software firms licensing policies have been a bit weak in effectively addressing virtualization and a real impediment for utility computing on many platforms.

I agree wholeheartedly with your points about new technology requiring education. Various people have different learning styles. Some people wouldn't take classroom training if you paid them. Others wouldn't crack a book and learn on their own. To effectively lead an organization out of the wilderness, you need to actively consider the learning styles of the groups your trying to lead. Of course not everyone who starts out makes it to the end -- that's nature.

Your final point is about vision. The first rule of leadership is that you need to lead. That means there needs to be some degree of vision. Point taken. EDS is trying to address the vision gap that it fell victim to through blogs, having a portfolio of standard offerings... Hopefully, you'll see the difference going forward.

Post a New Comment

: required  
required  
optional
required  
Please only click Submit once.

Subscribe to EDS RSS Feeds

I would like to receive the EDS Newsletter