Note: You are experiencing only the raw content of this site, without the intended layout and design. Either your browser has ignored the Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) files for this site, or you are using an outdated browser which does not support Web Standards. Learn more.

Home « Blogs

EDS' Next Big Thing Blog: Read and Respond to What the EDS Fellows Say About Technology

Read and respond to what the EDS Fellows have to say about the future of technology on EDS' Next Big Thing Blog on eds.com.

Are You Ready For Cell-Phone TV?

by Randy Mears

Here we go again, another grand experiment in cell-phone technology and a new crop of cell-phones to match. Mobile TV, in the cell-phone space, needs to be inexpensive if it is to succeed in the current US market. I am usually excited by the advance of mobile technologies, when I can see the benefit; I am however puzzled by the perception that there is a need for Mobile TV to be implemented on cell-phones, at this point in time. I do get that cell-phone TV is ultimately in the cards, what I don't get is why now? In today's mobile landscape, is this just technology for technology’s sake?

There is a difference between listening to mp3s while you are otherwise engaged and watching a hand-held television, a feat that requires visual as well as auditory focus. Although I do use my iPod to watch TV programs and movies that I download from iTunes (I only watch while traveling on an airplane), I don’t pay a monthly fee for the privilege or rely on connectivity which is tenuous at best and non-existent at worst. Just because a device has a display screen, it doesn't necessarily follow that it has to be a TV. The bottom line, I am a hopeless consumer of new mobile technologies, but I’m not even slightly enticed by the cell-phone TV idea, particularly as it stumbles, and it will; through its early adopter stages.

This is just my two cents, but wouldn’t it be great if the big cell-phone service providers were to focus on improving their overall service? I may be taking a leap here but I think that most of us would prefer better coverage, clearer signals and fewer dropped calls over another new bleeding edge, add-on feature.

Sorry about the rant, I feel much better now!

Published Wednesday, March 07, 2007 3:25 PM

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# Posted by Ben Dash Thursday, March 08, 2007 1:52 AM

I'm ready for mobile TV, in fact I already have it, thanks to MythTV and AT&Ts HSDPA 3G.

Being able to catch the news headlines, with video, as I'm either arriving at or leaving from the office and walking through the carpark has been invaluable for me as my hectic schedule keeps me busy at all hours of the day.

The next stage is to utilize MythTV's time "stretching" capabilities to stream pre-recorded TV to the phone at faster than normal speed.

Not only do we hardly ever watch live TV at the house anymore but we generally watch it at 1.4 speed.  A one hour programme may be viewed in 22 minutes, at 1.4 speed with commercial skipping.  Far from what you may expect, that 1.4 speed video would seem to be obviously faster, it's almost unnoticeable.  In fact, when you go back to normal speed you wonder why everything seems so   S l o w.

The next big thing will be MANets, Mobile Ad-hoc Networks.  "Cell" networks would be a  distant memory as mobile nodes mesh with one another in a constantly changing dynamic topology.

# Posted by Randy Mears Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:55 PM

Ben,

Unfortunately, poor quality cell-phone calls are not a distant memory; they are a reality that we have to live with here in the US today.  I just think that it would be better for the big providers to achieve reliable, standardized cell-phone service before cobbling on yet another side service.  I appreciate your forward looking response and find your solution of combining HSDPA and MythTV to be technically interesting, but I still don't want one.

# Posted by David Scott Lewis Friday, March 09, 2007 9:49 PM

Randy, I'm with you -- but appreciate Ben's enthusiasm as a lead user.  It's just way too early.  I like the idea, however, of having updates sent to me and automatically downloaded so I can view programs as they become available, without syncing to a desktop.  But as much as I like this idea, I'm currently skeptical given too many technological limitations.

I have to admit that I like watching a TV show (really, more often a video podcast like ABC World News) while I'm waiting for or on a subway, although in order to hear my iPod the volume is set to the maximum -- and I wonder what this is doing to my hearing.  A Bose noise cancellation-audio combination would be a great: Kill the background noise while providing for a comfortable listening experience.

# Posted by Ben Dash Saturday, March 17, 2007 5:09 AM

I doubt that the US as a whole will achieve the level of population density required to allow for cost effective high quality ubiquitous mobile coverage any time soon.

Fortunately for me, I'm lucky enough to live in an area with great coverage today and so I'm delighted that I can now get >1Mbps in a 40 mile radius of my house for mobile TV/DVR, web browsing or whatever else.

BTW, I have a low tech solution for the ipod noise problem, much cheaper than Bose:

<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FPeltor-Professional-Canceling-Earmuff-H10A%2Fdp%2FB00009LI4K&tag=bensquestiona-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325">Peltor Professional Canceling Earmuffs</a>

Post a New Comment

: required  
required  
optional
required  
Please only click Submit once.

Subscribe to EDS RSS Feeds

I would like to receive the EDS Newsletter