Note: You are experiencing only the raw content of this site, without the intended layout and design. Either your browser has ignored the Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) files for this site, or you are using an outdated browser which does not support Web Standards. Learn more.

Home « Blogs

EDS' Next Big Thing Blog: Read and Respond to What the EDS Fellows Say About Technology

Read and respond to what the EDS Fellows have to say about the future of technology on EDS' Next Big Thing Blog on eds.com.

Whither The Next User Interface?

by Randy Mears

Major breakthroughs in user interfaces have been few and far between. Historically the command line interface was the first to give us a practical man-machine dialogue. The text based interface followed and improved on the command line by supporting the concept of forms (fields in context). The next major step was the Graphical User Interface, which is also the current preferred one for most of us. Computers aren’t people so we shouldn’t expect to interact with them using the same “inefficient” methods that we use to communicate with each other; or should we?

The truth is that human communications techniques are often actually very efficient, especially when you include facial expressions, body language and voice inflection. We know intuitively that these things, properly integrated with both new and existing user interface components, have the potential to give us the best of both worlds. We often discuss these things but the fact is that we have seen little commercial progress in getting there.

Enter the multiple finger touch screen, called “Surface” recently announced by Microsoft. Though it is an evolutionary idea, it may be a big enough step to mark a new beginning for user interface design and implementation. I think it may be nearly as important a stepping stone as the mouse once was. Granted there are more sophisticated interfaces currently in R&D, but "Surface" will be a product this year. Though it may seem inspired by the holographic interface from the movie “Minority Report” there isn’t much real similarity; such science fiction movie interfaces are too grand a goal to achieve in a single step. As tiny steps go, the touch pad and touch screen may have been the beginning of this one. Ideas like placing two fingers on a touchpad and in an up, down, left, right or diagonal motion as a means of scrolling have been in place for a few years. Even so, they are a far cry from what “Surface” promises, but a start none-the-less.

Credit where credit is due, Microsoft deserves kudos on this, particularly if it hits the market on schedule. A touch screen that reacts to and follows the location of multiple simultaneous touches, is a significant advancement that will, I expect, make a very big difference. Once it matures a little and reaches the right price point we should expect it to be rapidly adopted by both businesses and consumers.

Published Friday, June 08, 2007 5:55 PM

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# Posted by Francis M Arackel Friday, June 15, 2007 7:00 AM

I think the next big thing in interface is a revolution in present keyboard. See, the qwerty keys are organised 100 or so years back,  but the psycological studies of men and women of different age and nationality groups reveals that the old qwerty keys need to be redesigned according to the physics of different types of humans. (ref Ency clopedia brittanica latest)

At least, the keying characteristics of men and women are dramaticaly different, so with kids and oldys. The habits  and physicq of male and female are different, so do the likes and dislikes-color,taste, character and their purpose of make- So, my point is, keybords need to be redesigned accordingly. She like pink keys, he likes blue. just like skirt and pants of their likes. Why should we keep the qwerty ? Bill gates changed the face of screen forever, but the keyboard remain unchanged.

hertrogenity..I think that is the next era in interfacing

farackel@yahoo.com

# Posted by Sammy Andrews Monday, June 18, 2007 7:42 PM

You can effectively remap your keyboard. There are some programs that alloww you to change the mapping and save it in a profile. This is so each user can change to their own profile. I if you want to there is even a tool to remove the keys from your keyboard.

# Posted by David Scott Lewis Monday, June 25, 2007 1:19 AM

I totally agree (with Randy's take on Surface).  I've been wondering what Microsoft Research has been doing with billions of dollars in annual spend.  It certainly wasn't spent on Vista!!  (Or, at least I hope they didn't spend it on Vista; if they did, they didn't get a good ROI.)

Surface is different, takes the user experience to a different level.  I'm impressed, although concerned with things like security issues.

Look, a lot of us go to SIGCHI and related conferences.  We've seen better UIs in various stages of R&D.  But, like Randy pointed out, Surface is a product that will be released this year, not an ongoing NSF, DARPA, NASA, ONR or AFOSR funded project.

To the funding agencies, keep up the funding.  I suspect the Surface team was inspired by stuff they've seen at SIGCHI and SIGGRAPH, stuff development in academia.

But kudos to Microsoft for coming up with Surface.

Post a New Comment

: required  
required  
optional
required  
Please only click Submit once.

Subscribe to EDS RSS Feeds

I would like to receive the EDS Newsletter