Note: You are experiencing only the raw content of this site, without the intended layout and design. Either your browser has ignored the Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) files for this site, or you are using an outdated browser which does not support Web Standards. Learn more.

Home « Blogs

EDS' Next Big Thing Blog: Read and Respond to What the EDS Fellows Say About Technology

Read and respond to what the EDS Fellows have to say about the future of technology on EDS' Next Big Thing Blog on eds.com.

The Apple Effect

by Randy Mears

Apple, Inc., the company responsible for the iPod, iTunes, iPhone, Mac mini and iMac continues to fascinate the computer industry and attract the attention of the press. The press, no doubt, has recent fond memories of the iPhone's extraordinary hype-fest.

Apple's ability to grab hold of the press's attention has evolved over the years as has the company's charisma (which appears to be inexorably linked to Steve Jobs, one of its founders). With a zeal far beyond that which Ron Popeil could muster in a 1970's TV commercial, Jobs is Apple's master pitchman and visionary – he continues to be just what the doctor ordered. Apple's deafening silence during the Jobs-less years (the period when Jobs and Apple were going their separate ways) ended with Jobs' re-emergence as interim CEO at Apple, in 1997. Jobs' value to the company was clearly discernable ten years ago when he put the deal in motion for Microsoft to invest $150 million into re-forming his foundering company. For Apple, life began anew.

Apple's current run-up most noticeably began in January, 2001 with the introduction of iTunes. It was followed shortly, in October 2001, by the iPod. The iPod was an innocent enough toy tossed into an emerging but anemic market. It was not by mistake or coincidence that Apple ultimately was able to expand and dominate that market or that the iPod ultimately became the launch pad for the Apple we know today.

So here we are, looking at an Apple whose stock price has increased by more than a factor of 10 since 2003. Some may argue that a large percentage of that run-up is attributable to the hype of the iPhone, and I would partially agree with them, but I think that the introduction of Apple's newest iMac may be a signal of real growth that Apple has quietly booked over the last couple of years. In its third quarter, Apple sold 634,000 desktop computers for a revenue of almost $1 billion and 1,130,000 portables for a revenue of $1.6 billion. That's not much by Windows PC standards but it is a high growth figure for Apple (over 30% higher than the same quarter last year).

As we move into an age where simplification is becoming a necessity, we shouldn't sell Apple's stylish simplicity and ease of use short. But there's something else about Apple's products of late, something about the way they look and feel; something that quietly says "buy me and take me home" in my neighborhood, newly transitioned Apple households have been popping up like mushrooms, one iMac at a time.

Will the new iMac' lower price and slimmer package continue to win converts and increase sales? I don' know but I sure could use one in my kitchen.

Published Friday, August 10, 2007 2:23 PM

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# Posted by Murali Narayanan Monday, August 13, 2007 8:30 PM

Apple does not only make it's product stylish and simple, but also consistent and reliable.  Price is the only factor that keeps the apple away.

Well, no wonder Apple is good for health.

Oh! I want one too.

# Posted by Mark Sokolik Wednesday, August 22, 2007 6:10 PM

While the iPod brought Apple back to the attention of the masses it is the design of their computers that wins the purchase. In particular I think Apple has learned to design a machine for the user instead of for the designer. The Macintosh uses unix, is the only standard os with a level 4 security designation from the US Military, includes an x-server with every machine, has all the unix tools yet doesn't tell anyone in their commercials - because the average end user doesn't care. The fact that it has a real-time OS with asymetric-multi-tasking of every processing unit, including the GPUs, doesn't matter to the end user - but the fast and fancy graphics in cover-flow does (which is made possible by the techno stuff).

Microsoft seems to build with no focus. Its a hodge-podge of features that are collectively frustrating to use.

Linux seems to be a collection of closely related operating systems that serve as domonstrations of peoples abilities to surmount technical challenges. Linux always seems to feel unfinished, great potential that is never realized in a completed thought.

# Posted by Russ Campbell Tuesday, October 14, 2008 1:43 PM

Spec out a Dell equivalent to a Mac (laptop or desktop) and you'll find they're about the same price.  That's where the similarity ends.  Everything after that drives price in favor of Apple...mainly in terms of software.  The stuff that comes as part of the Mac OS (iLife, et al) is better than most of the apps you have to pay for on the windows side.  I found I don't need any of the Norton Utility type apps and anti-virus is optional (mainly to prevent passing something on to a windows machine).  I also don't need anti-spyware type apps.  Essentially, all the CPU cycles are used for what I'm working on and not running background processes plugging holes to keep the ship afloat.  Couple that with the time saved not having to troubleshoot, repair and maintain the system and Macs are the best deal going.  After spending 15 yrs in the Windows world, the contrast is startling.

Post a New Comment

: required  
required  
optional
required  
Please only click Submit once.

Subscribe to EDS RSS Feeds

I would like to receive the EDS Newsletter