Note: You are experiencing only the raw content of this site, without the intended layout and design. Either your browser has ignored the Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) files for this site, or you are using an outdated browser which does not support Web Standards. Learn more.

Home « Blogs

EDS' Next Big Thing Blog: Read and Respond to What the EDS Fellows Say About Technology

Read and respond to what the EDS Fellows have to say about the future of technology on EDS' Next Big Thing Blog on eds.com.

Central electricity management in IT

by Charlie Bess

In one of the podcasts I listen to they were talking about how folks in the northeastern US and the UK are starting to put natural gas power generators in their homes to generate electricity as well as heat their houses. Any excess power generated can then be placed back on the power grid. These devices can be controlled (to some degree) by the power company. This would allow the power company to fire up these generators on those peak electricity demand days so they’ll not have to build another power generator. The reason why it is limited to the northeastern US is because of high energy costs making it cost effective. The UK is providing tax benefits in addition to their high energy costs.

The IT version (I’d heard proposed by a hardware company) is to put CPU clock regulation under central control and allow the IT organization to turn down the power consumption of the CPUs on days when the organizations power usage is getting beyond a limit. The problem with this perspective is that it implies that the value generated by computing is independent of instructions executed. Those instructions should be generating value to the business. I’m sure there are cases where this could save the organization money, but it could easily be a frustrating experience. It might be simpler just to force all the machines into a sleep state unless user interaction takes place, but that capability already exists. The other interesting issue with this proposal is that the organizations who are the most cash strapped and want to do something like this would need to replace all their hardware, so I doubt that it would ever happen.

There are better techniques to enforce system configuration settings now, so you can strongly encourage people to use the power settings on their existing devices constantly.

Published Wednesday, October 24, 2007 2:03 PM

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# Posted by Charlie Bess Saturday, November 03, 2007 8:34 PM

I can understand that perspective. It is amazing the amount of energy we could save just in being more efficient. The days of cheap power are coming to a close and so our behavior needs to adjust to the times. You're right energy enables wealth, but inefficient energy use enables nothing.

# Posted by greg bailey Wednesday, November 07, 2007 8:38 PM

...but pushing conservation, as a macroeconomic approach, is nothing more than a promise to the producers and would be producers, that demand will retract. Market entrants may become shy of invading a "shrinking" market. Newer, more expensive technologies, that were counting on the price of electricity to continue to rise, to cover initial investments, will soon be in full retreat, as are many of the petroleum refining projects since the latest energy bills which require a 20% drop in petroleum usage. While demand growth will likely exceed even the greatest conservation schemas, historically capitalism grows best in an initially inefficient economy. It is self-ordering, no meddling required. :-)

Post a New Comment

: required  
required  
optional
required  
Please only click Submit once.

Subscribe to EDS RSS Feeds

I would like to receive the EDS Newsletter